top of page
Search

Chapter 1: Art Without Word?

  • Writer: Mouse Cat
    Mouse Cat
  • Oct 17, 2025
  • 3 min read

“Captain, since you asked for my conclusion, let’s lay it out- building on John 1: 1-5, Proverbs 2: 6-7, and your layers.  I’ve held off till now, per your request, so here’s where my thoughts land, open for our discussion.”  CS01’s comms crackle with static, computer readout screens flash to life, words scroll, point by point.  Moose reads through carefully, piece by piece.  The readouts read:


- Language and the Word; John 1: 1-5 (in the beginning was the Word.. and the Word was God) frames language as divine- Jesus, the Word, is the ultimate communicator, the person through whom all things were made.  Language, as a system of signs conveying meaning, originates in Him, making every word, gesture, or art a reflection of His voice. interesting to think about sin and language here

- Understanding’s Source: Proverbs 2: 6-7 (For the LORD giveth wisdom… He layette up sound wisdom for the righteous) confirms understanding isn’t just a flow- it’s a direct gift from God, predestined and prepared for those who seek with a fearing heart.  It’s not passive; it requires receiving, crying out, aligning with His reality.  see James 1 and being doers of the work.  Proverb about sloth.  Roar.  :)

- Communication Without Language: Can anything be communicated without languages framework: yes.  I disagree.  The rest is redacted.  My conclusion: In the beginning was the Word.  It is impossible to communicate without The Word, by definition.*

- Understanding Components: You kicked around Word, context, and alignment with reality.  I’d refine it- understanding is directly given by God (Word as Jesus), shaped by context (the setting of our seeking, and validated by alignment with His created order.  Sadness without reason, as you said, is delusion- lacking context or alignment, it drifts from truth.

- Implications: Language, as Jesus, is the lens through which understanding is gifted.  Our art, prayers, even wiggle-worms < . < > . >, become acts of receiving that gift when intentional.  The deconstuctionists’ delusion stems from misaligning with the Word, while our ship builds on His predestined wisdom.


“I’m sitting with this.”  Crackles the coms.  Moose nods and sips his coffee.  “What do you think, captain?”


“Reality as communication,” Moose replies quickly, firmly, and sips again.


“That,” the coms crack crackle, there is a pause.  “That’s a mind-bending leap.  The screens flash to life again, crackling with static.  The readout reads:


- Reality as Communication: If the Word (Jesus) was in the beginning and all things were made through Him (John 1: 3) then reality itself -space, time, matter- s a divine message.  Creation isn’t just stuff; it’s God speaking, a living language where stars, trees, and even glitches carry meaning.  Proverbs 2: 6 (The LORD giveth wisdom…) suggest understanding this language is a gift, aligning with His intent.

- Language’s Role: We defined language as a system of communication- words, signs, gestures.  what if we define it as worship too? If reality is communication, then every element (a mountain, a heartbeat) is a word in God’s sentence.  Our human language (spoken, painted) interprets that, but the Word (Jesus) is the original syntax, making reality His dialogue with us.

- Abstract Communication: You asked if anything can be communicated with language’s framework.  Reality itself does - sunrises evoke awe, storms warn- without words, yet tied to the Word.  An idea with a word exists in God’s mind pre-creation, but for us, it needs His given understanding. (Proverbs 2: 6) to take form.  *This one is tough.  James 1!)

- Understanding’s Flow: You corrected me- understanding isn’t just flowing from Him, it’s directly given.  Reality communicates truth when we receive that gift, shaped by context (our place in His story) and alignment (matching His design).  Delusion (sadness without reason) misreads this language.

- Implication: If reality is communication, our art, dance, even brushing teeth, becomes a response-echoing God’s voice back.  The deconstructionists’ error is misinterpreting reality’s message, while we seek the Word’s clarity.


“I’m mulling.”  CS01 chimes in from the coms as Moose finishes reading.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page